--- description: Get detailed information about R4J usability, features, price, benefits and disadvantages from verified user experiences. Read reviews and discover similar tools on Capterra United Arab Emirates. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: R4J Price, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra United Arab Emirates 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Requirements Management Software](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [R4J](/software/164178/requirements-management-for-jira-r4j) # R4J Canonical: https://www.capterra.ae/software/164178/requirements-management-for-jira-r4j Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.ae/software/164178/requirements-management-for-jira-r4j?page=2) > A native add-on to Atlassian Jira, which allows collaborating stakeholders to manage and structure requirements easily within Jira. > > Verdict: Rated **4.7/5** by 6 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses R4J? R4J - Requirements Management for Jira allows requirements engineers, product owners and all other stakeholders to collect, manage and maintain product or service requirements directly in Jira. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.7/5** | 6 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 5.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 100% | (10/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: ease solutions - **Location**: Oberhausen, Germany - **Founded**: 2003 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: $10.00 - **Pricing model**: Per User (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: R4J pricing depends on Jira user tier and environment (on premise vs cloud). Contact Sales (ease solutions) for detailed pricing information and a quote. - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Chromebook (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong SAR China, India, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Singapore and 7 more ## Features - Access Controls/Permissions - Change Management Software - Collaboration Tools - Prioritization - Project Management Software - Task Management Software - Task Progress Tracking - Version Control - Workflow Management Software ## Integrations (3 total) - Jira - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Word ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base Software - Phone Support - Chat ## Category - [Requirements Management Software](https://www.capterra.ae/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Requirements Management Software](https://www.capterra.ae/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) - [Application Lifecycle Management Software](https://www.capterra.ae/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.ae/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.ae/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15312 reviews) 3. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.capterra.ae/software/162954/reqsuite) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 4. [ReqView](https://www.capterra.ae/software/145388/reqview) — 4.6/5 (49 reviews) 5. [Aha\!](https://www.capterra.ae/software/144020/aha) — 4.7/5 (561 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Simple Requirement Management for JIRA" — 5.0/5 > **Rahul** | *13 July 2022* | Industrial Automation | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The simplistic interface of R4J Add-In makes it very easy to manage and track requirements within the JIRA. Most software projects manage requirements using JIRA, but most struggle with managing requirements and organizing them, R4J excels in this aspect. > > **Cons**: The provision to define multiple versions of requirements could be a good value add. As of now, we have to update the single requirement if the requirement updates. It makes it little difficult to track the old requirements. Yes, we can do that via the History tab but this would be a good option to add. > > It is a good add-in that mixes very well with your JIRA experience and is very consistent with JIRA in all the ways. I would recommend anyone looking to manage requirements well in JIRA to consider this add-in. ----- ### "R4J for more than requirements" — 4.0/5 > **Henrik** | *16 November 2020* | Automotive | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Easy to keep everyone involved in the requirement management. Makes traceability easy and simple for everyone to understand. The issue tree view, easy to organize and get an overview. Helps all work in JIRA. Easy to create export templates, both word and excel. > > **Cons**: Export template error messages could be improved. > > Helps throughout our ASPICE process development. Keeps traceability from customer requirements - test cases - test executions - documentation. ----- ### "Now we have our Jira data structured\!" — 5.0/5 > **Thomas** | *27 October 2021* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: We were looking for a tool to organize our customer requirements and development tasks in a structured hierarchy. With R4J we found an easy and cost-efficient solution. The revision history and the baselining capability help us to keep track of our change history. The multi-level coverage provides us an overview of all depending elements. Quick way to share my views with my project team. > > **Cons**: Minor small features missing, but this doesn´t matter. ----- ### "R4J for medical devices" — 4.0/5 > **Petra** | *5 November 2021* | Medical Devices | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: I love the easy child access here, along with R4Js capability to handle any amount of parent-child hierarchies you might desire to trace (and document coverage of) your requirement. Take T4J in addition and this capability extends to verification specifications and even verification reports. 👍 I also appreciate the flexible export options to word documents with an extensible configuration language and word templates. > > **Cons**: That R4J and T4J are not available as cloud products (yet?) > > CogniMed provides technical development services in regulated industries such as medical technology and aviation. We develop hardware, software and complete products for customers. Our focus is on perfectly documented development services for this demanding environment. We have been using R4J for many years and projects by now. It is is perfect for our needs. Our customers love it, too and some have acquired the tools themselves after learning how to work with it at our company.“ ----- ### "Using R4J for Jira Requirements Management" — 5.0/5 > **Joyce** | *23 August 2022* | Government Administration | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Cost, setup, and ease of use. Traceability and Requirements reuse were a must for us. > > **Cons**: Would like more granular permissions in folder view. > > This is an awesome app. We have successfully built a full Application Lifecycle Management tool within Jira. R4J offers requirement reuse, baselines, and complete traceability. This tool comes along with exceptional customer support as well. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.ae/software/164178/requirements-management-for-jira-r4j?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.ae/software/164178/requirements-management-for-jira-r4j) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | ja | | ----- ## Structured Data