--- description: Get detailed information about HackerRank usability, features, price, benefits and disadvantages from verified user experiences. Read reviews and discover similar tools on Capterra United Arab Emirates. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: HackerRank Price, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra United Arab Emirates 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Pre-employment Testing Software](/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) > [HackerRank](/software/143549/hackerrank) # HackerRank Canonical: https://www.capterra.ae/software/143549/hackerrank Page: 1 / 5\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.ae/software/143549/hackerrank?page=2) > Industry-leading platform empowers tech recruiters to screen, interview, and hire top technical talent at scale. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 91 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses HackerRank? Any company that needs to hire technical talent such as software engineers, AI/ML engineers, data scientists and engineers, web and mobile developers, and more. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 91 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: HackerRank - **Founded**: 2012 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: $199.00 - **Pricing model**: Usage Based (Free Trial) - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, American Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium and 208 more ## Features - Applicant Tracking Software - Assessment Management - Automatic Grading - Candidate Comparison - Candidate Management - Collaboration Tools - Customizable Questions - Customizable Tests - Data Import/Export - Interview Management - Interview Scheduling - Online Tests - Performance Metrics - Pre-Employment Testing - Pre-made Test Library - Question Library - Reporting/Analytics - Scoring - Skills Assessment - Template Management - Templates - Test/Quiz Creation - Tests/Assessments ## Integrations (6 total) - Avature - Greenhouse - JazzHR - Jobvite - Lever - Workable ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base Software - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) - Chat ## Category - [Pre-employment Testing Software](https://www.capterra.ae/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) ## Related Categories - [Pre-employment Testing Software](https://www.capterra.ae/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) - [Assessment Software](https://www.capterra.ae/directory/31117/assessment/software) - [Applicant Tracking Software](https://www.capterra.ae/directory/30060/applicant-tracking/software) - [Recruitment Software](https://www.capterra.ae/directory/30602/recruiting/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Zoho Recruit](https://www.capterra.ae/software/125768/zoho-recruit) — 4.5/5 (1260 reviews) 2. [100Hires](https://www.capterra.ae/software/206957/100hires) — 4.9/5 (1174 reviews) 3. [micro1](https://www.capterra.ae/software/1077474/micro1) — 4.9/5 (729 reviews) 4. [ZipRecruiter](https://www.capterra.ae/software/130706/ziprecruiter) — 4.2/5 (10941 reviews) 5. [NEOGOV](https://www.capterra.ae/software/75288/neogov) — 4.5/5 (850 reviews) ## Reviews ### "A Reliable Hiring Tool with Room to Grow Beyond Coding" — 4.0/5 > **Prishi** | *14 July 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: Key highlights include: Candidate activity monitoring – The platform tracks time-on-screen and captures screen size metadata, which helps reviewers assess candidate behavior and flag potential anomalies during assessments. Question library \& defaults – Adding default/pre-built questions is straightforward, making it easy to standardize assessments across roles without starting from scratch each time. Ease of setup – The overall configuration experience is intuitive, reducing the administrative overhead for hiring teams. These features collectively make HackerRank a strong choice for teams looking to run structured, auditable technical interviews at scale. > > **Cons**: While HackerRank excels in many areas, there are a few friction points worth noting: Custom question creation is cumbersome – Adding custom questions is not straightforward and can be time-consuming, especially for teams that need to tailor assessments beyond the default library. The process lacks the simplicity you'd expect given how polished the rest of the platform is. Diagram-based questions are challenging for candidates – When assessments include custom diagrams or drawing-type questions, candidates often struggle with the interface. The drawing tools are not intuitive, which can introduce unnecessary friction during the test and may affect performance for reasons unrelated to the candidate's actual skill. These limitations are worth considering if your hiring process relies heavily on custom or visual problem formats — in such cases, supplementing HackerRank with a dedicated diagramming or whiteboarding tool may be necessary. > > HackerRank is a solid platform for conducting technical assessments, particularly for programming and coding-focused evaluations. The built-in question library, candidate monitoring features, and ease of standardizing assessments make it a reliable choice for most engineering hiring workflows. That said, the platform has room to grow in certain areas: Architectural \& system design questions – HackerRank is not yet optimized for architecture-style assessments. The tooling for whiteboarding, diagramming, and evaluating system design thinking feels underdeveloped compared to its strong coding evaluation capabilities. ----- ### "Outstanding Partnership and Value" — 5.0/5 > **Georgia** | *27 February 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: How it enabled us to scale and to improve our processes. The platform is incredibly easy to navigate and use. It gives us a great window into how someone will perform in their interviews and shifting to live coding interviews has been game changing. > > **Cons**: In the interviews the video aspect isn't great and could potentially be smoother if it ran through Google Meet instead. > > Hugely positive. The team are great and very responsive, they are as invested as we are to innovate and overcome challenges and this makes for a fantastic partnership. Working with them has allowed us to run new processes, have reliable data to back up changes and trust in what we are trying to build - together. Excellent value for money, helping us to save vast amounts whilst not faltering on quality. ----- ### "Hackerrank review" — 5.0/5 > **Rajul** | *18 June 2026* | Computer Networking | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: \* Scalable technical assessments that allow evaluation of large candidate pools efficiently. \* Objective and standardized evaluation, helping reduce bias in the screening process. \* Wide library of role-based questions across coding, SQL, AI/ML, security, and other technical domain > > **Cons**: Extremely hard DSA \* Competitive programming questions \* Questions that feel unrelated to the actual role > > Overall, our experience with HackerRank has been positive. The platform has enabled us to efficiently assess technical talent at scale through standardized and objective evaluations. Its extensive question library, assessment customization options, and integrity features have helped improve the quality of candidate screening while reducing manual effort ----- ### "Strong Platform for Technical Hiring" — 3.0/5 > **Sayali** | *7 May 2026* | Airlines/Aviation | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: Real Time Test Monitoring, Flagging code duplicates, Plagarism, Gives good filteration of candidates > > **Cons**: UI is not good, Its lags alot, keeps on parsing, shows red notifications, report download takes time, very slow > > Overall it solves the purpose to get creame candidates for technical development roles, Real Time monitoring candidate's activiy, Flagging the plagarism, Many types of coding questions for all levels, good opportunity for hiring managers to select. ----- ### "Great Platform - Keep Evolving \!\!\!" — 5.0/5 > **Abhinav** | *15 September 2025* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: One of the best product for tech screening to aid rapidly growing tech industry. The continuous improvement within the platform where they keep on adding new features to tackle the real workd challenges and making the product sufficient enough to ensure the right quality is being assessed is commendable. The platform is user friendly and easy to navigate and compatible with most of the latest tech stacks. It has many features that enables users to make the best use out of the platform with different operating models that can benefit users witht the cost management as well. We have been using the Hackerrank solution from more than three years and still remains the top choice to filter best talent where the test platform being accessed daily. It is very easy to onboard and integrate and the back office customer support is very good. Your queries are resolved within minutes. Additionally it keeps a regular check on possible internet leaks of the questions, revising the questions timely, AI and proctoring that makes it even more compelling. > > **Cons**: Interview platform is bit less user friendly as sometime it takes a while to admit candidates into the meeting on video call and they do join the chat and it leaves them bit confused as to whether they are actually logged in or not > > Overall experience has been good and the customer support is good too. The customization feature allows users to have their own test which is a good feature. ----- Page: 1 / 5\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.ae/software/143549/hackerrank?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.ae/software/143549/hackerrank) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data